Immigration – The Supreme Court’s ruling reversed the Ninth Circuit Court

Immigration – The Supreme Court’s ruling reversed the Ninth Circuit Court

By Breck Dumas Via The Blaze-
Under federal law, detained aliens do not have the right to periodic bond hearings and can be held indefinitely under United States statutory law, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.

What was the case about?

The key plaintiff in the case, Alejandro Rodriguez, a legal permanent resident of the United States, has lived in the U.S. since childhood. After being convicted of a misdemeanor drug charge at the age of 24, Rodriguez was held for three years while authorities awaited the outcome of his deportation proceedings. Eventually, the American Civil Liberties Union took up his case, winning the cancellation of his deportation order, as well as his release.

Special: Have you bought this $0.30 green chip stock yet? Huge earnings expected

Representing roughly 1,000 immigrants in the class-action lawsuit, the ACLU successfully argued before the Ninth Circuit that immigrants who had committed deportable crimes should be entitled to bail hearings after six months of detention, under 8 U.S.C. section 1225. The Supreme Court’s ruling reversed the Ninth Circuit, with Judge Alito writing the opinion.

“Immigration officials are authorized to detain certain aliens in the course of immigration proceedings while they determine whether those aliens may be lawfully present in the country,” the decision read.

The plaintiffs had also argued that, if federal immigration law did allow them to be held indefinitely without bail, then that provision of federal law must be unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment. Since the Ninth Circuit did not rule on that question below, the Supreme Court kicked that issue back to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals for an initial determination. This means it might not be the last time the SCOTUS hears it.

Justice Stephen Breyer, however, used strong words in his dissent, stating that “No one can claim, nor since the time of slavery has anyone to my knowledge successfully claimed, that persons held within the United States are totally without constitutional protection.”

The Obama administration first filed the appeal, accusing the 9th Circuit Court of rewriting “the law governing detention of criminal and terrorist aliens in removal proceedings.” Trump’s administration continued the case.

What does the decision mean?

Immigration advocates and the ACLU point to the backlog of deportation cases, with the Government Accountability Office reporting that deportation hearings are backlogged for several years before some judges. This means a normal wait time for an illegal immigrant being detained has gone from 198 to 404 days, with a ratio of 1,456 cases per judge.

Further, the case is sure to reignite arguments about what rights illegal aliens have under the Constitution.

The Blaze

 

Comments

  1. Any rights they had were left @ the border they crossed…illegally.Sneak into any country elsewhere illegally and get caught,they will tell you the same.Worse if you commit a crime.

  2. Char in ND says:

    Illegal immigrants are not to be afforded automatic protections as guaranteed under our Constitution. It is the Constitution of the USA – protects our fundamental rights as CITIZENS. This should not be construed as applicable to a foreigner. And they are foreigners, not citizens. I don’t see why this is so hard to understand. Of course many attorneys and courts do understand, they are just trying to muddy the waters.

    If our borders remain open and porous and anyone, anywhere in the world has a ‘right’ to come here and stay, our nation is no longer sovereign. This is national suicide, and any nation, regardless of how strong or wealthy, cannot sustain such a policy.

    • Well said Char! Isn’t suicide the goal of the Left? The Cloward–Piven strategy is to collapse the capitalist system, then start over with statism. That’s why nothing they do makes sense to us. They have different dreams. They don’t like the United States being a constitutional republic. They want to fundamentally transform us into a socialist utopia. “Any means necessary.” Opening the borders, giving out welfare is intentional suicide to them. They just disguise it by calling them “dreamers” and preying on innocent minds with the “compassion” angle. That’s how they recruit so many young people on college campuses. I guess all we can do is ring the alarm bells and try to make as many people as possible see the truth about what the Left is doing. God bless you my friend.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s