Kim Davis in Jail, Criminal Illegals Out of Jail

By Daniel Horowitz Via Conservative Review –

Consider this for a moment: Kim Davis was thrown into jail for disobeying a court opinion that created a constitutional right to something that never existed until 2001 – at the expense of the oldest and most foundational right – religious liberty. On the same day, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a transgendered illegal alien, who was convicted of drunk driving, cannot be deported to Mexico because he faces the likelihood of “torture.”

Let that sit and simmer for a moment.

Continuing on, Edin Carey Avendano-Hernandez illegally entered the country in 2000, was arrested twice for drunk driving and was deported in 2007. He reentered illegally thereafter and petitioned the court to stay his deportation for fear of torture. The Ninth Circuit has now granted him reprieve under the U.N. Convention Against Torture (CAT).

Let that sit and simmer for another moment.

Now this excerpt from a Daily Caller story:

Judge Jacqueline Nguyen, an Obama appointee, chastised immigration officials for improperly handling Avandano-Hernandez’s gender identity. “The [judge] failed to recognize the difference between gender identity and sexual orientation, refusing to allow the use of female pronouns because she considered Avendano-Hernandez to be ‘still male,’ even though Avendano-Hernandez dresses as a woman, takes female hormones, and has identified as woman for over a decade,” Nguyen’s decision says. “Although the BIA correctly used female pronouns for Avendano-Hernandez, it wrongly adopted the [judge’s] analysis, which conflated transgender identity and sexual orientation. The BIA also erred in assuming that recent anti-discrimination laws in Mexico have made life safer for transgender individuals while ignoring significant record evidence of violence targeting them.”

Folks, this is not a laughing matter. I’ve been warning about the coming judicial time bomb from that reality of Obama replacing 30% of the federal bench with activist judges – the likes of which we’ve never seen before.
We now have a circuit judge applying international law, creating new transgendered rights, deciding a controversial societal issue over something universally regarded as a mental disorder until recently, and granting illegal aliens the right to remain in our country in contravention to the plenary power of Congress over immigration, our national sovereignty, and the very essence of the social contract.

As has been chronicled here, this is not an aberration, the lower courts have been granting illegal immigrants a panoply of rights and are releasing thousands of dangerous criminal aliens into our society against the consent of the people and the people’s representatives.

As David Bunning, the local district judge in Kentucky, ordered Kim Davis arrested and jailed he said, “the idea of natural law superceding [sic] this court’s authority would be a dangerous precedent indeed.”

We live in a time when the Constitution is rendered unconstitutional, and every perverted social view of the Left is being upheld as the new Constitution. In this case, the local judge is literally ruling the Declaration of Independence, built upon natural law, unconstitutional. At the same time, judges throughout the country are violating the entire preamble of the popular sovereignty and consent-based government declared in the Declaration by ordering illegal aliens to violate our sovereignty.

Citizens are being stripped of the most unalienable rights, yet aliens are being granted constitutional rights and even super rights.

Let me ask all the “professional” pundits on the right and left the following question: is this decision from the Ninth Circuit also the law of the land?

At what point do we draw a line in the sand? So many pseudo conservative scholars are still vehemently opposed even to the constitutional recourse of jurisdiction stripping. What is there recourse? What is there solution?

If we continue down this path legitimizing every illogical, immoral, and illegal opinion from the courts we will be left with no civil society, sovereignty, or liberty.