Obama’s Economic Isolation Of Israel

Obama’s Economic Isolation Of Israel

Finally, Obama leads from the front: The Hamas-FAA move against Ben Gurion

By J.E. Dyer- Via Liberty Unyielding-

For whatever reason, the Obama administration wasn’t willing to wait and lead from behind on this one. Within hours of a Hamas rocket landing near Ben Gurion airport – for the first time in the current conflict – the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued an order banning U.S. carriers from operating there. As many readers will have heard, a Delta Airlines flight headed for Ben Gurion on Tuesday had to turn around over the Mediterranean and divert to Paris.

The ban is in effect for 24 hours, starting at 12:15 EDT on the 22nd. The ban will be revisited at the end of the 24 hours (which at this point is about 10 hours from now).

A number of European nations have followed suit.

An unjustified political action

Pundits and other advocates have been swift to condemn this U.S. action, a serious measure of economic isolation which will deny Israel millions of dollars in commercial revenues even if it lasts only 24 hours. Eugene Kontorovich points out that the message is prejudicial and the timing is suspicious, with John Kerry heading for Israel to try to broker a ceasefire.

The subtext here is that Israel has a sword at its neck: face a private-sector no-fly zone or agree to a cease-fire that lets Hamas keep its rockets, and thus close Ben Gurion Airport again at the time of its choosing. It is a lose-lose proposition. …

Moreover, the timing of the FAA’s absurd and unjustified warning seems to have more to do with Kerry’s visit to the region to impose a cease-fire on Israel. Until his administration’s flight ban, that effort seemed entirely futile.

The message is unsubtle. “Nice commercial hub you got, there, Bibi. Be a shame if anything happened to it.”

Kontorovich observes further that the FAA would have been more consistent with its policies elsewhere if it had issued a warning rather than imposing a ban. He cites the example of Afghanistan.

I would cite the example of Pakistan, where there have been multiple, very serious attacks on commercial airports in recent months, including an attack on an airliner in Peshawar, this one on the airport in Karachi, and an earlier one involving Taliban rocket fire in Peshawar. In terms of the type of threat posed, the Pakistan Taliban is a fairly exact analogy to what Hamas can threaten Ben Gurion in Lod, Israel with – except that Israel does a much better job of securing Ben Gurion against the Hamas threat. In none of the instances in Pakistan has the FAA banned U.S. carriers from flying in and out of the Pakistani airports. At most, it has issued safety warnings.

Meanwhile, the implication many will propose, about an abundance of caution after the MH17 shootdown over Ukraine, falls apart on inspection. The potential for a Hamas rocket to fall near the airport isn’t the same threat as the one posed by the fully militarized pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine. The pro-Russian separatists have the weaponry to shoot an airplane out of the sky at altitude – and they had actually done it before the MH17 shootdown. That game-changing condition is not present in Israeli air space.

Ordinarily – as with Pakistan – the U.S. would take such things into account and avoid issuing flight bans against an ally’s airport. As an “abundance of caution,” the flight ban on Ben Gurion is a psychotic one in comparison with the FAA’s use of its judgment elsewhere. See the Special Notices here for the FAA’s ongoing warnings for U.S. carriers about air space in Ukraine, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and North Korea. And note that in spite of the much greater potential threat to commercial aircraft in Syria and Iraq (for example) than in Israel, the prohibitions for U.S. carriers are not absolute in either nation.

The prohibition on Ben Gurion is uniquely stringent, and inconsistent with FAA practices elsewhere. It also had to be approved by Obama. Israel is an ally, one of America’s closest partners in the world. Cutting off her commercial airport from U.S. carriers is inherently a presidential-level decision, and Obama is responsible whether he made it or not.

Cutting the cords of the past

Gatestone Institute suggests that the Hamas-FAA move against Ben Gurion – my formulation; that’s essentially what it is – has effectively eliminated any viable “two-state solution.” Israel can’t tolerate the existence of a neighboring state that can hold the life’s blood of her economy at risk whenever it wishes – especially if Israel’s own chief ally doesn’t back Israel’s interests up, but instead throws in with her enemies.

What Obama has certainly killed with the Hamas-FAA gambit is any prospect of a new “peace agreement,” the Holy Grail pursued with such longing by Kerry. There is no basis for a substantive agreement now. Whatever happens at 12:15 EDT on 23 July, the U.S. has proved itself a faithless ally – or, at best, a worthless one, easily spooked and unprepared to back Israel up in enforcing the rule of law against lawless terrorism.

I continue to predict that Netanyahu will persist with the ground operation in Gaza as long as it takes to seriously degrade Hamas’s terror infrastructure, but ultimately will conclude a ceasefire agreement that effectively resets – for the time being – to the status quo ante. If I had my choice, I would see Israel destroy Hamas completely, this summer. But to insist on that, regardless of consequences, is to misread Israel’s freedom of action.

It is right now, at any rate. I note that Fatah could maneuver for a big gain out of this conflict, if its leadership ceased its weak-hand support of Hamas and shifted to a more cooperative posture with Israel. The glimmer of an interesting possibility, in which Fatah would take control of Gaza under an agreement supervised by Israel and Egypt, is beginning to throw off sparks of obviousness. It would not be a lasting solution, of course. Whether there is time for mindsets in the region to adjust to that kind of interim vision will depend, I think, on how long the IDF ground operation continues.

Ironically for Obama and Kerry, however, what their little Hamas-FAA gambit has done is liberate Israel from the constraints of the Oslo mindset. Whatever the ceasefire arrangement is, it will be temporary. And everyone except Barack Obama and John Kerry will understand that Israel – along with all the other parties – will develop a new goal and a new strategy coming out of this conflict. The likelihood is much stronger than it was three weeks ago that that new goal will not involve a “two-state solution.”

Liberty Unyielding

Comments

  1. genomega1 says:

    Reblogged this on News You May Have Missed and commented:
    Obama’s Economic Isolation Of Israel

  2. PM Netty should tell Obama that he will level Gaza in retaliation for O trying to cripple Israel financially. I think our Pres knows that PM Netty does not lie. O should tell Hamas that if any commercial plane is hit or if airport targeted, then US Airforce will assist in protecting it by whatever means necessary. IOW, tell Hamas that we will kick their butt instead of kissing it. Pres O must be a man and stand up for what is right and look down the terrorists.

  3. the way it is being done even many supporters of Israel do not see this as a political move but as a “safety move” for Americans. Thanks for putting it out there. I saw it right away.

  4. Hamas every couple years will lob rockets into Israel knowing they can’t win but the game is to get public opinion against Israel and to gain addition funds from the USA for the Palestinians
    which I’m sure goes more for weapons rather then food.
    We have an administration that does not like Israel nor it seems American citizens for that matter, one can draw your own conclusion as to why.
    Israel will never live in peace until they eliminate the threat totally, sadly when dealing with fanatics there is no other choice.

  5. Bet a donut that Putin ends up negotiating the ceasefire.

  6. I have always appreciated Israel’s protection of sacred Christian locations in Bethlehem and Jerusalem, If Israel falls so does all history of Christianity. We as Americans will not allow that to happen, so the concept of free men of the world forming Christian militias to protect our heritage comes into play, let us not forget that Americans can own guns, and that armed Americans outnumber all armies of the world combined and that real Christians won’t be fooled by an Islamic state that claims,,”. If you let us kill the Jews, we will finally be nice to the Christians,, well tell this to the Christians in Mosul, who are being crucified and murdered in vast numbers unreported by the US mainstream media..We as Christians know all too well that Islamic extremists want to kill us almost as much as Jews and that should the Jews be exterminated the Christians will be next on the plate of Radical Islamists hatred…

  7. Here’s a new word America: #Obamihad

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s